Major U.S. Bank Regulatory Filings
| Filing |
Filed By |
Filed To |
Frequency |
Purpose |
| Y-9C (Consolidated Financial Statements) |
Bank Holding Company (BHC) / SLHC |
Federal Reserve |
Quarterly |
Consolidated financial statements, capital monitoring |
| Y-9LP (Parent Company Only) |
Bank Holding Company |
Federal Reserve |
Quarterly |
Parent-only income and condition (double leverage, debt) |
| Call Report (FFIEC 031/041/051) |
Banking Subsidiary |
OCC (national banks), Fed (state members), FDIC (state nonmembers) |
Quarterly |
Core balance sheet, income, capital, loan/deposit detail |
| FR Y-14 (Stress Test Reports) |
Large BHCs > $100B |
Federal Reserve |
Quarterly / Annual |
Data for CCAR/DFAST stress testing |
| 10-K / 10-Q / 8-K |
Public Bank Holding Companies |
SEC |
10-K annual, 10-Q quarterly, 8-K event-driven |
Investor financials, MD&A, risk, material events |
| Proxy Statement (DEF 14A) |
Public Bank Holding Companies |
SEC |
Annual |
Solicit shareholder votes (directors, comp, proposals) |
| FR Y-6 (Annual Report) |
Bank Holding Company |
Federal Reserve |
Annual |
Corporate structure, ownership, governance |
| FR Y-10 (Org Structure Changes) |
Bank Holding Company |
Federal Reserve |
Event-driven (30 days) |
Report acquisitions, divestitures, control changes |
| FR Y-15 (Systemic Risk Report) |
Large BHCs / IHCs |
Federal Reserve |
Annual |
Systemic footprint for G-SIB surcharge |
| FR Y-11 (Nonbank Subsidiaries) |
Bank Holding Company |
Federal Reserve |
Quarterly / Annual |
Financials of significant nonbank subs |
| FFIEC 009/009a (Country Exposure) |
Banks with foreign exposures |
Federal Reserve |
Quarterly |
Break down international exposures by country |
| CRA Exams & Public File |
Banking Subsidiary |
OCC / FDIC / Fed |
~Every 2–3 years |
Evaluate community lending to LMI areas |
| FR Y-16 (Stress Testing for $10B–$100B) |
Mid-size BHCs / Banks |
Federal Reserve |
Annual (when required) |
Dodd-Frank stress testing (repealed for many) |
DEALER acronym for accounting:
| Letter |
Account Type |
Increases With |
Decreases With |
| D |
Dividends |
Debit |
Credit |
| E |
Expenses |
Debit |
Credit |
| A |
Assets |
Debit |
Credit |
| L |
Liabilities |
Credit |
Debit |
| E |
Equity |
Credit |
Debit |
| R |
Revenue |
Credit |
Debit |
General overview:
Investment Bank - Banking vs Markets
| Investment Banking - Want to raise money |
Global Markets - Have money and want to invest |
| Mergers & Acquisitions – Advise on buying and selling companies or segments |
Sales – Help investors buy or sell stock, bonds, or derivatives |
| Debt Capital Markets – Raise money in bond markets |
Trading – Buy and sell stocks, bonds, or derivatives from clients |
| Leveraged Finance – Help high-debt companies raise bonds and loans |
Electronic Trading – Connect investors to exchanges and execution platforms |
| Equity Capital Markets – Raise money in the stock market |
Financing – Help investors finance their positions |
| |
Research – Provide investment insights through reports and analysis |
Sales and Trading Classifications
FICC:
- Rates
- Currencies
- Credit
- Commodities
- Mortgages
- Munis
Equities:
- Cash
- Derivatives
- Prime Brokerage
Macro Products: - That rely on overall market/economy
Spread Products:
- Bonds
- Loans
- Securitized Products
- Emerging Markets
Quant Roles:
- Pricing Models
- Algo Trading
- Research
- Market Risk
- Counterparty Risk
Research:
- Equity
- Macro / Fixed Company
Products that require Balance Sheet Prowess:
| Boutique Bank Products |
Products Requiring Balance Sheet |
| Mergers and Acquisitions |
Bank Revolvers |
| Equity Capital Markets |
Investment Grade Syndicated Loans |
| Equity Sales & Trading |
Trade Finance, Letter of Credit |
| Leveraged Finance and Private Capital |
Cash Management |
| Investment Management |
Investment Grade Debt Origination |
| Wealth Management |
Derivatives (Swaps, Futures, Options) |
| |
Credit Trading |
Raising Funds Options:
| Cost Level |
Category |
Instruments / Options |
| Lowest Cost |
Asset Backed Finance |
Receivables, Trade Finance, Inventory |
| |
Debt |
Commercial Paper (Short Term), Bonds, Loans |
| Highest Cost |
Equity |
IPO (First Issuance), Follow-On (Additional Issuance), Convertible Bonds |
M&A Advisory Work
- Acquisitions
- Exclusive Sales
- LBOs
- Fairness Opinion
- Divestiture / Spin-Offs
- JVs
- Restructuring
- Defense/Activism
| Invest |
Grow |
Exit |
| Acquisition |
Bolt-on/Roll-ups |
Strategic Sale |
| Minority Stake |
Fundraising |
Secondary Sale |
| |
Divestiture |
IPO |
ECM Work:
- IPO
- Follow-on
- Converts
- Share Repurchase
DCM Work:
- Bonds: IG & HY
- Loans: IG Loans
- Money Markets
- ABS/CLO/MBS
- Municipal Finance
- Emerging Markets
- Liability Management
- Sovereign Debt / Supranational Agencies
Risk Solutions:
- Provide hedging: Interest rates, Forex, Commodity
- Sit with the private side, for private-side transactions
- Typically uncollateralized - need to calculate xVAs/pricing, etc
Functional Types of IB Work
- Execution / Live Deal
- Pitching / Origination
- Internal Work
Bank Metrics:
- Total loan portfolio
- ROAA
- ROAE
- ROATCE
- Deposit Ratio = Deposits / Total Liabilities
- NIM
- Efficiency Ratio = Non-Interest Expense/Total Income
Some example Things to do:
- Capital Roll Forward
- Benchmarking Analysis
- Risk Management
Capital Roll Forward:
- CET1 now to CET1 a few years down the line. What is driving the change: Earnings growth/dividends/RWAs? => build that waterfall chart
Benchmarking Banks:
Comparison Dimensions:
- Profitability
- Growth
- Efficiency
- Quality of Assets
- Capitalization
Selecting Peer Group:
- Products Offered
- Size (loan portfolio / assets)
- Geography
- Industry Server
- Funding / Capitalization
Finding Peer Groups:
- SNL
- Bank’s Investor Presentation
- FDIC (difficult)
Risk Management Page:
- NPLs / Total Loans
- Net Charge off Ratio = Net charge-offs / Total loans
- Allowance for Credit losses / Total Loans
- Provision for credit losses and Net charge offs
1. Past Due Loans
| Aspect |
Explanation |
| Definition |
Loans where scheduled payments are late — typically 30 days or more past due, but still accruing interest if the borrower is expected to catch up. |
| Purpose |
Serves as an early warning signal of repayment issues. |
| Example |
A borrower misses a payment due on Sept 1 and hasn’t paid by Oct 1 → 30–59 days past due. |
| Typical Thresholds |
Banks break this down into 30–59 days, 60–89 days, and 90+ days past due. |
| Accounting Impact |
Still accrues interest income unless moved to nonaccrual status. |
2. Classified Loans
| Aspect |
Explanation |
| Definition |
Loans internally or regulatorily flagged as having potential or well-defined weaknesses, even if not yet delinquent. |
| Purpose |
Tracks credit deterioration before default — key internal risk-management tool. |
| Categories (per U.S. regulatory guidance) |
• Special Mention: Potential weakness. • Substandard: Well-defined weakness jeopardizing repayment. • Doubtful: Collection highly questionable. • Loss: Considered uncollectible (to be charged off). |
| Basis for Classification |
Borrower financials, collateral value, covenant compliance, or repayment trends — not limited to missed payments. |
| Accounting Impact |
Often still accruing but with heightened allowance for possible loss. |
| Aspect |
Explanation |
| Definition |
Loans that no longer accrue interest because collection is doubtful or they are 90 + days past due. |
| Purpose |
Reflects confirmed impairment within the loan portfolio. |
| Criteria (typical U.S. bank) |
• ≥ 90 days past due and unpaid, or • Placed on nonaccrual status because full repayment is unlikely. |
| Accounting Impact |
Interest recognition stops; typically covered by specific loan-loss allowance or partial charge-off. |
Relationship Between Categories
| Stage |
Description |
Category |
| Payment 30 days late |
Borrower behind on payments |
Past Due |
| Borrower shows strain or covenant breach |
Early deterioration but may still be current |
Classified (Special Mention / Substandard) |
| Borrower stops paying ≥ 90 days |
Default, repayment uncertain |
Non-Performing Loan (NPL) |
In short, a single loan can progress from Past Due → Classified → Non-Performing as conditions worsen.
How These Are Defined
| Source |
Description |
| Internal Bank Policy |
Each bank sets thresholds (e.g., 30 days = past due; 90 days = nonaccrual). |
| Regulatory Guidance |
Defined by the OCC, FDIC, and Federal Reserve under the Uniform Retail Credit Classification and Account Management Policy and Interagency Guidelines for Credit Risk Review. |
| Judgment-Based |
Classification may depend on borrower cash flows, collateral strength, or covenant performance — not just delinquency days. |
Example – Multi-Family Loan at OBK
| Stage |
Scenario |
Category |
| Borrower 40 days late on payment but expected to cure |
Slight delinquency |
Past Due (0.36%) |
| Borrower current but DSCR falling below covenants |
Heightened risk |
Classified (Substandard) |
| Borrower 90 + days unpaid, collateral < loan balance |
Default |
Non-Performing (0.36%) |
Why These Metrics Matter
- Indicate early credit stress trends before full defaults appear.
- Inform loan-loss provisioning and capital planning.
- Provide investors and regulators a clear view of portfolio quality trajectory.
Understanding AOCI in Banks
** What is AOCI (Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income/Loss)?**
AOCI is a component of shareholders’ equity that captures unrealized gains or losses not yet reflected in the income statement.
For banks, this mainly comes from changes in fair value of securities, but can include other items as well.
** Major Sources of AOCI in Banks**
| Source |
Description |
Typical Impact |
| Available-for-Sale (AFS) Securities |
Unrealized gains/losses from changes in market value of bond portfolios marked to fair value under ASC 320. |
Usually largest driver of AOCI (negative when rates rise). |
| Derivative / Hedging Adjustments |
Effective portion of cash-flow hedges under ASC 815. |
Moderate impact, depending on hedge book. |
| Pension Adjustments |
Actuarial gains/losses from defined-benefit plans. |
Minor for most regional banks. |
| Foreign Currency Translation |
Exchange-rate changes on foreign subsidiaries. |
Minimal for domestic banks. |
** Why AOCI Matters**
| Impact Area |
Explanation |
| Tangible Book Value (TBV) |
Unrealized losses in AOCI reduce TBV, lowering P/TBV multiples and equity strength. |
| Regulatory Capital |
Under Basel III: • Large banks include AOCI in CET1. • Community banks can elect to opt out. |
| Investor Valuation |
Analysts adjust TBV for AOCI to reflect true economic equity. |
| Earnings Volatility |
AOCI shields unrealized mark-to-market swings from hitting EPS until securities are sold. |
** Example – Origin Bancorp (OBK) Q3 2025**
| Metric |
Value |
Comment |
| AOCI Balance |
−$61.2 million |
Unrealized bond losses from AFS portfolio. |
| Securities Yield |
3.62% |
Up from 3.16% in Q2 after repositioning. |
| Portfolio Duration |
4.31 years |
Moderate rate sensitivity. |
| Portfolio Mix |
42% MBS, 26% Municipals, 26% CMOs, 6% Corporate |
MBS drives rate sensitivity. |
Why Analysts Adjust TBV for AOCI
-
Reflect Economic Equity:
TBV should represent real shareholder value — unrealized losses in AOCI are real market hits even if not realized.
-
Purchase Accounting Alignment:
In M&A, all assets and liabilities are marked to fair value. AOCI therefore becomes economically realized at closing.
-
Peer Comparability:
Banks differ in AFS vs. HTM mix. Adjusting for AOCI ensures all are evaluated on the same marked basis.
AOCI Treatment in M&A
| Step |
Description |
Impact on Deal Math |
| 1️⃣ |
Target’s AFS portfolio holds unrealized losses in AOCI. |
TBV already reduced by AOCI. |
| **2️⃣ |
|
|
| ** |
Acquirer revalues securities to fair value at closing. |
AOCI is wiped out; replaced by fair-value “mark.” |
| 3️⃣ |
Mark is amortized (GAAP term) / accreted (economic term) into income over time. |
Reduces Day-1 TBV dilution; boosts NII over time. |
| 4️⃣ |
Analysts explicitly include this in merger models. |
Captures both capital and earnings effects. |
Example – TowneBank Deal Disclosure
AOCI Securities Mark-Down: ~$2.7 million amortized over 4 years (straight-line method)
Interpretation:
- The target’s AFS book had unrealized losses sitting in AOCI.
- On closing, those are marked to fair value (−$2.7m).
- That mark is amortized (GAAP term) over 4 years, effectively accreting back into NII.
Modeling Implications
| Metric View |
Meaning |
| Including AOCI |
Reflects economic TBV (accounts for unrealized losses). |
| Excluding AOCI |
Reflects accounting TBV (ignores market value). |
| Day-1 TBV Impact |
Mark reduces tangible equity at closing. |
| Future Earnings Impact |
Mark reverses (accretes) into income over amortization period. |
Amortization vs. Accretion – Terminology Clarified
Why the Word “Amortization” Is Used
Even when income increases over time (as discounts reverse), GAAP still calls the process “amortization” because the effective-yield or straight-line method is used to allocate the fair-value adjustment.
In other words:
“Amortization” describes the method, not the direction.
Economic vs. Accounting View
| Perspective |
Term Used |
Direction |
Effect on Income |
| GAAP / Accounting |
Amortization |
Applies to both premiums and discounts on assets |
Can increase or decrease income |
| Analyst / Economic |
Accretion |
Used when a discount increases income over time |
Income rises as discount unwinds |
Example
| Item |
Fair-Value Mark |
Accounting Disclosure |
Economic Description |
Effect |
| AFS Securities |
−$4.0m |
“Amortized over 4 years” |
“Accretes back into NII” |
+$1.0m income per year |
| Fixed Assets |
−$1.0m |
“Amortized over 30 years” |
Reversal increases noninterest income |
Gradual income accretion |
Amortization vs. Accretion by Balance Sheet Category
| Category |
GAAP Term |
Direction of Impact |
Effect on Income |
Why |
| Assets (Loans, Securities, Fixed Assets) |
Amortization |
Mark-down (discount) → income rises as discount unwinds |
Increases NII |
ASC 310-20 & ASC 805 define effective-yield amortization for assets. |
| |
|
Mark-up (premium) → income falls as premium amortizes |
Decreases NII |
Same method, opposite sign. |
| Liabilities (Deposits, Borrowings, CDs, FHLB) |
Accretion |
Mark-down (discount) → liability value grows → cost rises |
Reduces NII |
GAAP uses “accretion of discount” for liabilities approaching par. |
| |
|
Mark-up (premium) → liability amortizes down → cost falls |
Increases NII |
“Accretion” applies in both cases. |
Shortcut Rule
| Item Type |
Term Always Used |
Economic Effect |
| Assets |
“Amortized” |
Income may increase (discount) or decrease (premium). |
| Liabilities |
“Accreted” |
Cost may increase (discount) or decrease (premium). |
In a Bank Merger Model
| Item |
Mark Direction |
GAAP Term |
Economic Effect |
| Securities / Loans |
Down (discount) |
Amortized |
Increases income (accretes). |
| Core Deposits |
Up (premium) |
Accreted |
Reduces income (expense amortizes). |
| Time Deposits / Borrowings |
Down (discount) |
Accreted |
Increases income (lower funding cost). |
Summary
| Concept |
GAAP Word |
Economic Word |
Net Effect on Earnings |
| Asset write-down (discount) |
Amortization |
Accretion |
Increases NII |
| Asset write-up (premium) |
Amortization |
Amortization |
Decreases NII |
| Liability discount |
Accretion |
Accretion |
Decreases NII |
| Liability premium |
Accretion |
Amortization |
Increases NII |
Bottom Line:
- Assets are always “amortized.”
- Liabilities are always “accreted.”
- The economic effect (income up or down) depends on whether it’s a discount or premium — not on the word itself.
Understanding Bank Deposit Types and Characteristics
1️⃣ Overview
Deposits are the primary funding source for a bank.
From the bank’s perspective, deposits are liabilities — funds owed to customers — and thus are often shown as negative numbers in presentations.
[
\text{Assets} = \text{Liabilities} + \text{Equity}
]
Deposits = Funding Source (Liability)
Loans/Securities = Uses of Funds (Asset)
2️⃣ Key Deposit Categories
A. FDIC Insured Deposits
| Feature |
Description |
| Definition |
Balances fully covered by FDIC insurance (up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category). |
| Typical Source |
Retail customers and small businesses. |
| Behavioral Profile |
Very stable – core deposit base. |
| Cost of Funds |
Low – often noninterest-bearing or low-rate checking/savings. |
| Regulatory View |
Strongest funding quality. |
| Accounting Treatment |
Liability; shown as a negative number. |
B. FDIC Insured Reciprocal Deposits
| Feature |
Description |
| Definition |
Large customer deposits placed via reciprocal networks (e.g., IntraFi ICS / CDARS) that are split into smaller insured chunks across participating banks. |
| Mechanism |
Bank places excess funds with the network and receives an equal amount of reciprocal deposits back from other banks. |
| Purpose |
Allows customers to maintain full FDIC coverage while keeping the relationship with one bank. |
| Regulatory Treatment |
Not brokered if the bank is well-capitalized and within limits (post-2018 FDIC rule). |
| Behavioral Profile |
Stable / core-like, relationship-based. |
| Cost of Funds |
Slightly higher than retail deposits but cheaper than brokered CDs. |
C. FDIC Insured Brokered Deposits
| Feature |
Description |
| Definition |
Deposits obtained through third-party brokers or online listing services. |
| Purpose |
Used to quickly raise liquidity when loan growth exceeds local deposit base. |
| Regulatory View |
Considered non-core / volatile funding. |
| Behavioral Profile |
Rate-sensitive and flight-prone. |
| Cost of Funds |
Higher – requires competitive rates. |
| Usage Example |
Common in liquidity-stressed banks or rapid balance sheet expansion. |
D. Public Funds Deposits
| Feature |
Description |
| Definition |
Deposits from state and local governments, school districts, and other public entities. |
| Examples |
City payroll accounts, school district operating funds, or tax receipts. |
| Legal Requirement |
Must be fully insured or collateralized above FDIC limit. |
| Collateralization |
Pledged securities or FHLB letters of credit. |
| Behavioral Profile |
Moderately stable, but often seasonal (tax and budget cycles). |
| Cost of Funds |
Moderate; priced competitively to attract municipalities. |
| Liquidity Impact |
Stable but collateralized → reduces balance sheet flexibility. |
E. Collateralized Deposits
| Feature |
Description |
| Definition |
Deposits backed by pledged assets (U.S. Treasuries, municipal bonds, or FHLB LOCs). |
| Who Uses Them |
Primarily for public deposits above FDIC insurance limits. |
| Purpose |
Protects depositor in case of bank failure. |
| Accounting Treatment |
Deposit liability offset by pledged collateral (encumbered asset). |
| Behavioral Profile |
Stable but reduces available liquidity (pledged assets cannot be reused). |
| Risk Trade-off |
Safer for depositor, costlier for bank liquidity management. |
F. Uninsured / Uncollateralized Deposits
| Feature |
Description |
| Definition |
Deposits exceeding the $250,000 FDIC insurance limit and not backed by pledged collateral. |
| Typical Source |
Large corporate, commercial, or wealth-management clients. |
| Behavioral Profile |
Rate-sensitive and volatile – most likely to move in stress events. |
| Risk |
Flight risk during market uncertainty or confidence shocks. |
| Cost of Funds |
Higher – must offer competitive yields to retain balances. |
| Analyst Focus |
Tracked closely to gauge potential run-off risk and liquidity exposure. |
G. Total Estimated FDIC-Insured Deposits
| Feature |
Description |
| Definition |
Combined total of FDIC-insured, reciprocal, and brokered deposits that carry explicit insurance. |
| Purpose |
Indicates the insured portion of total deposit base. |
| Interpretation |
A higher share = lower liquidity risk. |
| Typical Ratio |
Healthy regional banks show 40–60% insured deposits. |
3️⃣ Collateralization Explained
| Concept |
Meaning |
| Collateral Requirement |
Public deposits above FDIC limits must be secured by pledged assets. |
| Common Collateral Types |
U.S. Treasuries, Agency bonds, Municipals, FHLB letters of credit. |
| Impact on Liquidity |
Collateral is encumbered – cannot be sold or repo’d. |
| Trade-Off |
Safer for depositor but limits bank’s flexibility. |
4️⃣ Deposit Composition Example (OBK – Q3 2025)
| Category |
Balance ($000) |
QoQ % |
Key Insight |
| FDIC Insured |
3,407,017 |
+1.0% |
Core retail and business deposits. |
| FDIC Insured Reciprocal |
1,056,176 |
+6.4% |
Full-insurance relationships via ICS/CDARS. |
| FDIC Brokered |
0 |
(–100%) |
Fully eliminated. |
| Collateralized |
690,933 |
–16.8% |
Secured public funds using pledged assets. |
| Public Funds |
865,637 |
(flat) |
Government entities – seasonal. |
| Uninsured / Uncollateralized |
3,177,704 |
+9.5% |
Large corporate balances – more volatile. |
5️⃣ Deposit Type Comparison Summary
| Deposit Type |
FDIC-Insured? |
Collateral Required? |
Relationship Depth |
Funding Stability |
Liquidity Impact |
| Retail / Consumer |
✅ Yes |
❌ No |
High |
Very Stable |
None |
| Commercial |
Partially |
❌ No |
High |
Stable |
None |
| Public Funds |
✅ Yes |
✅ Yes (above limit) |
Medium |
Moderately Stable |
Encumbers collateral |
| Reciprocal |
✅ Fully |
❌ No |
High |
Stable |
None |
| Brokered |
✅ Fully |
❌ No |
Low |
Volatile |
None |
| Collateralized |
✅/Secured |
✅ Yes |
Medium |
Stable |
Reduces liquidity |
| Uninsured / Uncollateralized |
❌ No |
❌ No |
Medium |
Volatile / Flighty |
None |
6️ Key Takeaways
- Deposits are liabilities — shown as negatives because they’re owed to customers.
- Public funds are government deposits that must be insured or collateralized.
- Collateralized deposits are safe for depositors but consume liquidity (pledged assets unavailable).
- Reciprocal deposits (ICS/CDARS) are insured and relationship-based — core-like.
- Uninsured deposits are the most rate-sensitive and least stable.
- Strong banks monitor mix of insured vs. uninsured and collateralized vs. free deposits to manage liquidity and cost of funds.
Analyst Insight:
When evaluating a bank’s funding profile, focus on:
- % of insured deposits (stability)
- % of uninsured / uncollateralized (run risk)
- Level of collateral encumbrance (liquidity constraint)
- Trends in reciprocal deposits (relationship strength)
Coverage Ratio – Liquidity Strength Metric (Origin Bancorp Example)
[
\text{Coverage Ratio} = \frac{(a + b)}{c}
]
Where:
| Symbol |
Description |
Value ($000) |
| a |
Total Additional Liquidity Sources (FHLB lines + Unpledged AFS + Fed window) |
4,449,913 |
| b |
Cash & Cash Equivalents |
626,909 |
| c |
Uninsured, Non-Collateralized Deposits |
3,177,704 |
| d = (a + b)/c |
Coverage Ratio |
1.60× |
What It Measures
It measures how much available liquidity a bank has relative to its uninsured, non-collateralized deposits — i.e., the most flight-prone funding source.
Interpretation:
For every $1 of uninsured, non-collateralized deposits, the bank holds $1.60 of available liquidity.
Why It Matters
| Aspect |
Explanation |
| Post-SVB Focus |
After 2023’s banking turmoil, investors track uninsured deposit exposure closely. |
| Liquidity Stress Test Proxy |
Tests whether the bank could cover a rapid outflow of uninsured deposits. |
| Regulatory Lens |
A non-LCR ratio used by community/regional banks to signal resilience. |
| Investor Comfort |
Ratios >1.0× suggest enough coverage for high-stress withdrawal scenarios. |
Components Explained
| Component |
Nature |
Liquidity Speed |
| Cash & Cash Equivalents (b) |
Immediate funds held on balance sheet. |
Same-day |
| Unpledged AFS Securities |
Securities available for sale or repo. |
Within 1–2 days |
| FHLB Borrowing Availability |
Secured funding line from Federal Home Loan Bank. |
Within hours |
| Fed Funds Lines & Discount Window |
Emergency access to Federal Reserve liquidity. |
Same-day |
| Uninsured, Non-Collateralized Deposits (c) |
Deposits above FDIC insurance cap, unpledged. |
Can leave quickly |
Typical Ranges
| Coverage Ratio |
Interpretation |
| >1.5× |
Very strong liquidity; ample cushion. |
| 1.0–1.5× |
Adequate coverage; manageable stress scenario. |
| <1.0× |
Tight liquidity; would require asset sales or external funding. |
OBK’s 1.60× ratio indicates a strong liquidity position.
Summary Table
| Metric |
Definition |
Formula |
3Q25 Value |
Meaning |
| Coverage Ratio |
Available liquidity vs. uninsured deposits |
(FHLB + Unpledged AFS + Fed Lines + Cash) ÷ Uninsured deposits |
1.60× |
OBK holds $1.60 of accessible liquidity for every $1 of uninsured deposits. |
Analyst Tip
Rule of Thumb: Coverage Ratio ≥ 1.25× is considered healthy.
Below 1× means the bank could not fully cover its uninsured outflows without outside funding.
The higher the ratio, the greater the liquidity resiliency and regulatory comfort.
Understanding the Statement of Comprehensive Income vs. Income Statement (Using Origin Bancorp Example)
Core Difference
| Statement |
What It Shows |
Scope |
| Income Statement (Statement of Income) |
Performance from operating activities — revenues, expenses, provisions, and taxes. |
Net Income (bottom line of core profitability). |
| Statement of Comprehensive Income |
Includes Net Income + Other Comprehensive Income (OCI) — changes in equity from non-owner sources. |
Comprehensive Income (total change in equity excluding capital actions). |
[
\text{Comprehensive Income} = \text{Net Income} + \text{Other Comprehensive Income (OCI)}
]
Why Banks Need a Separate “Comprehensive” Statement
Banks hold large portfolios of Available-for-Sale (AFS) securities, derivatives, and hedges, which are marked to market.
Changes in their fair value affect shareholders’ equity, but not net income — unless the securities are sold.
Therefore, GAAP requires these unrealized gains/losses to be reported in Other Comprehensive Income (OCI).
How the Two Statements Flow Together
| Category |
Appears in Income Statement? |
Appears in OCI (Comprehensive Statement)? |
Example (OBK 3Q25) |
| Interest income / expense |
✅ Yes |
❌ No |
$100.8M Net interest income |
| Provision for credit losses |
✅ Yes |
❌ No |
$36.8M provision |
| Operating expenses |
✅ Yes |
❌ No |
Salaries, occupancy, etc. |
| Unrealized gain/loss on AFS securities |
❌ No |
✅ Yes |
$15.8M gain in OCI |
| Cash flow hedge gains/losses |
❌ No |
✅ Yes |
$(70)k adjustment |
| Tax effects on above items |
❌ No |
✅ Yes |
$3.3M tax expense on AFS gain |
| Net income (bottom line) |
✅ Yes |
✅ Used as starting point |
|
| Comprehensive income (final line) |
❌ No |
✅ Yes (Net Income + OCI) |
$21.0M total comprehensive income |
Typical Components of OCI for a Bank
| OCI Item |
Source |
Why It’s in OCI (not Net Income) |
| Unrealized gains/losses on AFS securities |
Mark-to-market changes in AFS portfolio |
Not realized through sale yet |
| Unrealized gains/losses on cash flow hedges |
Derivatives used to hedge interest rate risk |
Hedge accounting rules defer recognition |
| Foreign currency translation adjustments |
For foreign operations (not relevant for OBK) |
Non-cash, unrealized impact |
| Pension plan adjustments |
Actuarial changes in defined-benefit plans |
Long-term, not core earnings |
Link to AOCI (Balance Sheet)
Everything reported under Other Comprehensive Income (OCI) accumulates into
AOCI (Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income) within Shareholders’ Equity on the balance sheet.
[
\text{Ending AOCI (Balance Sheet)} = \text{Beginning AOCI} + \text{Current Period OCI (Statement of Comprehensive Income)}
]
OCI affects equity (and thus Tangible Common Equity and TBVPS) — even though it doesn’t affect earnings.
Summary Table
| Aspect |
Income Statement |
Comprehensive Income Statement |
| Purpose |
Measure profitability from operations. |
Measure total change in equity from all sources except capital actions. |
| Includes |
Revenues, expenses, provision, taxes. |
Net income + OCI (AFS, hedges, etc.). |
| Output |
Net Income. |
Comprehensive Income. |
| Impacts |
Earnings (EPS, ROAA). |
Equity (AOCI, TBVPS). |
| Used for |
Valuation & P/E analysis. |
Capital strength & TBV analysis. |
| OBK Example (3Q25) |
Net income $8.6M |
OCI $12.4M → Comprehensive income $21.0M. |
Analyst Tip
The Income Statement tells you what the bank earned.
The Comprehensive Income Statement tells you what the bank is worth more or less by — even before those gains/losses are realized.
That’s why analysts often adjust TBV for AOCI, but not EPS, because AOCI changes capital, not earnings.