Issued Stock vs. Outstanding Stock: Key Differences
Category | Issued Stock | Outstanding Stock |
---|---|---|
Definition | Total number of shares a company has ever sold (includes both outstanding shares and treasury stock). | Total number of shares held by investors (excludes treasury stock). |
Includes Treasury Stock? | Yes, includes both shares held by investors and repurchased shares (treasury stock). | No, excludes treasury stock since those shares are held by the company itself. |
Held by Investors? | Not necessarily—some issued shares may be repurchased by the company and held as treasury stock. | Yes, outstanding stock consists only of shares that are currently in the hands of investors. |
Used to Calculate EPS? | No, issued stock is not used for EPS calculations. | Yes, outstanding stock is used in EPS (Earnings Per Share) calculations. |
Can Change Over Time? | Yes, if the company issues new shares or buys back shares. | Yes, when companies issue new shares or repurchase shares. |
Formula Relationship
Issued Stock = Outstanding Stock + Treasury Stock
Example
- A company initially issues 1,000,000 shares.
- Over time, it buys back 200,000 shares, which become treasury stock.
- The outstanding shares now equal 800,000.
Thus:
1,000,000 (Issued Stock) = 800,000 (Outstanding Stock) + 200,000 (Treasury Stock)
Statutory Voting vs. Cumulative Voting
Feature | Statutory Voting | Cumulative Voting |
---|---|---|
Definition | A shareholder must vote the same number of shares for each board seat available. | A shareholder can allocate their total votes freely among one or more candidates. |
Formula for Total Votes | Shares Owned × Number of Seats Available | Shares Owned × Number of Seats Available (same as statutory voting) |
Voting Flexibility | Less flexible—votes must be split evenly across all candidates. | More flexible—votes can be concentrated on one or a few candidates. |
Effect on Minority Shareholders | Less favorable—majority shareholders have stronger control over the board. | More favorable—allows minority shareholders to increase their influence by pooling votes on specific candidates. |
Common Use Case | More common in large corporations where majority shareholders prefer control. | Often used in companies where protecting minority shareholders is a priority. |
Example | If a shareholder owns 1,000 shares and there are 3 board seats, they can cast 1,000 votes per seat. | If a shareholder owns 1,000 shares and there are 3 board seats, they have 3,000 total votes and can distribute them as they wish (e.g., all 3,000 votes to one candidate). |
Key Takeaways
- Statutory voting benefits majority shareholders, ensuring their preferred candidates win.
- Cumulative voting benefits minority shareholders, giving them a chance to elect at least one board member.
Board Elections: Typical Frequency, Board Size, and Candidate Contests
The number of candidates per board seat, the frequency of elections, and board size vary depending on company size and governance practices.
1. Board Elections Frequency
- Most common: Annual elections (though some companies have staggered terms).
- Staggered (Classified) Boards: Some companies elect one-third of the board every year to prevent hostile takeovers.
2. Board Size & Number of Candidates per Seat (Large Cap vs. Mid-Market vs. Small Cap)
Company Size | Typical Board Size | Number of Candidates per Seat | Election Frequency |
---|---|---|---|
Large-Cap (S&P 500 firms) | 9 - 15 directors | Usually 1-2 per seat (often unopposed) | Annual or staggered (every 3 years for a third of the board) |
Mid-Market ($500M - $5B valuation) | 7 - 11 directors | Usually 1-3 per seat (depends on activist investors) | Annual or staggered |
Small-Cap (< $500M valuation) | 5 - 9 directors | 1-5 per seat (sometimes competitive, especially in contested elections) | Annual |
3. Candidate Contests: How Many People Run for a Seat?
- Most common: 1 candidate per seat (the board nominates a candidate who is usually elected uncontested).
- In contested elections: 2-5 candidates per seat, especially when activist investors push for board changes.
- Hostile Takeover/Proxy Fight: Can have multiple candidates per seat (e.g., activist hedge funds nominate their own directors to challenge management).
4. Real-World Examples
Large-Cap Example: Apple Inc. (AAPL)
- Board size: 8-12 members.
- Election frequency: Annual elections.
- Candidates per seat: Typically one nominee per seat (low competition).
- Voting type: Statutory voting.
Mid-Market Example: Dick’s Sporting Goods (DKS)
- Board size: 7-10 members.
- Election frequency: Annual or staggered.
- Candidates per seat: Usually 1-2 per seat, but can increase in activist-driven cases.
Small-Cap Example: A Startup-turned-Public Company (e.g., Etsy in its early public years)
- Board size: 5-9 members.
- Election frequency: Annual.
- Candidates per seat: 1-5 (more competition, more influence from activist investors).
5. Key Takeaways
- Larger companies tend to have fewer candidates per seat (management’s nominees are rarely challenged).
- Smaller companies are more likely to see contested board elections.
- Board size decreases as company size decreases, with small-cap companies having 5-9 directors and large-cap companies having 9-15 directors.
- Elections are usually annual, but staggered boards spread elections over three years.
Major Regulations for the SIE Exam
Regulation | Description | Regulatory Authority |
---|---|---|
Regulation T (Reg T) | Sets initial margin requirements (typically 50%) for buying securities on credit. Also governs the use of credit in margin accounts. | Federal Reserve Board |
Regulation U (Reg U) | Governs how banks can extend credit for the purchase of margin securities. | Federal Reserve Board |
Regulation X (Reg X) | Requires borrowers (customers) to comply with Reg T and U if they obtain credit from foreign lenders to buy securities. | Federal Reserve Board |
Regulation D (Reg D) | Provides exemptions from SEC registration for private placements of securities under specific conditions (e.g., Rule 506). | SEC |
Regulation A (Reg A) | Allows small and mid-sized companies to raise capital with limited SEC registration (Tier 1 and Tier 2 offerings). | SEC |
Regulation M (Reg M) | Prohibits market manipulation during public offerings (e.g., underwriters cannot bid up prices during the restricted period). | SEC |
Regulation FD (Reg FD) | Promotes full and fair disclosure by requiring public dissemination of material nonpublic information. | SEC |
Regulation S-P (Reg S-P) | Requires firms to protect customers’ personal financial information and provide privacy notices. | SEC |
Regulation S-ID (Reg S-ID) | Requires broker-dealers and investment advisers to implement identity theft prevention programs (“Red Flag Rules”). | SEC |
Regulation SHO (Reg SHO) | Governs short selling and requires firms to locate securities before executing short sales. | SEC |
Business Entity Comparison with Examples
Feature | C-Corporation (C-Corp) | S-Corporation (S-Corp) | Limited Partnership (LP) | Limited Liability Company (LLC) |
---|---|---|---|---|
Legal Entity | Separate from owners | Separate from owners | Separate entity | Separate from owners |
Taxation | Double taxation (corporate + personal) | Pass-through to shareholders | Pass-through to partners | Usually pass-through, or elect corporate |
Owners | Shareholders | ≤ 100 U.S. shareholders | At least 1 general & 1+ limited partners | Members (no limit) |
Liability Protection | Yes — for shareholders | Yes — for shareholders | Limited for limited partners only | Yes — for all members |
Who Can Own | Anyone (including entities/foreigners) | Only U.S. individuals & certain trusts | Anyone | Anyone |
Shares Transferable? | Yes | Restricted | Usually restricted | Often restricted |
Management | Board of Directors & Officers | Board of Directors & Officers | General partner manages | Flexible: member or manager-managed |
Raising Capital | Easiest — public & private funding | Limited by shareholder rules | Moderate — common in private placements | Moderate — depends on structure |
Ideal For | Large companies, startups, IPOs | Small-to-mid-sized U.S. businesses | Private equity, real estate, hedge funds | Small-to-mid-sized businesses, real estate |
Common Examples | Apple, Microsoft, JPMorgan Chase | Local law firms, medical practices | Blackstone Real Estate Income Trust (BREIT), Oil & Gas partnerships | Real estate investment LLCs, family businesses |
Common Uses / Industries | Tech, banking, manufacturing | Professional services, small corporations | Investment funds, venture capital, real estate | Real estate, e-commerce, consulting, services |
Key Takeaways
-
C-Corporations (C-Corps)
C-Corps are ideal for large companies or startups seeking significant investment or planning to go public (IPO).
They offer unlimited shareholders, easy transfer of shares, and are attractive to institutional investors — but they come with double taxation (corporate and dividend level).
Commonly used in tech, finance, and manufacturing industries due to their growth needs and access to capital markets. -
S-Corporations (S-Corps)
S-Corps are suitable for small to mid-sized domestic businesses, like law firms, dental offices, or family businesses, that want pass-through taxation while still enjoying corporate liability protection.
They are limited to 100 U.S. individual shareholders and cannot be owned by entities, which makes them less flexible for expansion. -
Limited Partnerships (LPs)
LPs are favored by investment funds, real estate syndicates, and oil & gas ventures because they allow general partners to manage and limited partners to invest passively with limited liability.
This structure supports raising capital without giving up control, and provides pass-through tax treatment. -
Limited Liability Companies (LLCs)
LLCs are highly flexible and provide limited liability with fewer formalities.
They are popular among real estate investors, consultants, freelancers, and small business owners who want simple tax treatment and management structure, and the ability to choose how they’re taxed.
S-Corp vs. LLC – Key Distinctions and Why It Matters
Factor | S-Corporation (S-Corp) | Limited Liability Company (LLC) |
---|---|---|
Taxation | Default pass-through; profits/losses pass to shareholders, taxed on personal returns | Default pass-through, but can elect to be taxed as a C-Corp or S-Corp (flexible) |
Self-Employment Taxes | Owners can pay themselves a salary and avoid self-employment tax on remaining profits | All profits subject to self-employment tax unless taxed as S-Corp |
Ownership Restrictions | ≤ 100 U.S. individuals only; no entities, non-resident aliens, or multiple classes of stock | No restrictions — members can be individuals, entities, foreigners; multiple ownership classes allowed |
Formality Requirements | Requires Board of Directors, corporate bylaws, shareholder meetings, minutes | Less formal — no board or annual meetings required (unless state requires) |
Profit Distribution | Must distribute profits strictly based on ownership | Can allocate profits unevenly, regardless of ownership % |
Flexibility | Less flexible — designed to mirror a traditional corporation | Highly flexible — ideal for tailoring agreements among owners |
Ideal For | Businesses that want corporate structure with tax efficiency, or plan to draw salaries | Businesses needing flexibility in ownership, management, and profit sharing |
Choose an S-Corp if:
- You’re a small U.S.-based business with ≤ 100 shareholders.
- You want to save on self-employment taxes by paying yourself a reasonable salary.
- You’re okay with formal structure and equal profit sharing.
Choose an LLC if:
- You want maximum flexibility in ownership and profit allocation.
- You have foreign or entity owners or multiple classes of ownership.
- You want minimal corporate formalities and customizable agreements.